Selma
The first great decision the filmmakers of Selma made was
not to make a Martin Luther King Jr. biopic. It’s not that biopics can’t be
done well, it’s that there just so often unsatisfying at best (see: this year’s
charming but ultimately unsatisfying “Theory of Everything” as
reference). Selma is a very contained story – one that takes place in just a
few months of screen time. That’s a drop in the bucket, even considering Dr.
King’s sadly abbreviated life, but by focusing with greater detail on this
particular action he was involved in, more understanding, resonance and meaning
are reached. In simpler terms, this is a very, very good film.
David Oyelowo plays Dr. King alarmingly well. He opens the
pic by staring the audience straight in the eye as he practices his Nobel Peace
Prize speech. He is exhausted, dressed in uncomfortably formal clothes and
expresses his desire to go home with his wife, Coretta (Carmen Ejogo) and live
a simple preacher’s life. As an audience in the know, we can only sigh and
shake our heads at the cross that lies before him which he will be called to
pick up. Paul Webb’s script and Director Ava DuVernay’s direction deserve large
kudos for the courage to show Dr. King as a flawed individual and still a great
man at once. This humanity, rather than sainthood, grows his legend in terms of
accessibility – a massive departure from what King’s estate allowed previously
and a gift to all of us.
The shocking murder of four black girls in a Birmingham, AL
church lets us know Dr. King will not
get his much-desired rest; there is work to be done. Instead he picks a fight with the newly inaugurated
President of the United States, Lyndon Johnson (Tom Wilkinson). The power play
between these two men is central to the rest of the film. What they argue about
is less important than the way they argue and how, ultimately, Dr. King is able
to get the most powerful man in the world to bend to his way of thinking.
Selma deserves to be nominated by the Academy as one of the
year’s best, especially with up to 10 slots to offer. It is a well-timed release, particularly in the context of
recent events in Missouri and New York. Though those events and the ones
depicted in Selma are not the same, there are power plays between minorities
and authority in both narratives and, therefore, the parallels are worthy of
discussion.
The performances, sets, art design and costumes were all
stellar. At the same time, Selma as a whole, pales in comparison as a piece of
cinematic art to Whiplash, Budapest Hotel and Birdman. One could reasonably argue the
story lines of the latter films mentioned here do not have nearly the weight or
social importance of Selma. The retort is a question: should a film benefit in
the discussion of its worthiness as the Best Picture of a given year because of
its social relevance, particularly when that relevance is heightened due to
circumstances beyond the film’s control?
The nitpicks I have with Selma, artistically, have to do
partially with the occasional lapses into theatricality when I felt devoid of
the reality that had been set up on screen and was, instead, watching the film
as if it were on stage. That’s not about the actors, that is about how the DuVernay
chose to stage some of her sets. The camera work is also very strange in a
number of places with characters composed on the edges of frames, leaving
massive negative space that doesn’t seem to add any value. That doesn’t mean
the camera work is all bad – quite the opposite. It’s beautiful and gentle in many
places, allowing the audience an almost documentary-like feel or level of
access that works quite well with the subject matter. However the editing, too,
is jumpy at times, which may have been, at least in part, due to the occasional
odd composition of frames.
All of these things are small in comparison to the beauty,
emotion and importance the film brings forward, especially in light of the
current social context. Martin Luther King Jr. remains a towering figure over our society nearly 50 years after he was assassinated. Selma does an excellent job of hinting at the larger story and meaning of the man by focusing intently on a smaller set of actions he was involved in.
Resonance Rating: 4.5 out of 5
Resonance Rating: 4.5 out of 5
Comments
Post a Comment